domingo, 22 de junio de 2008

Y DIOS INCORPORO UN NUEVO WING... JUAN CRUZ MIGLIORE - Q.E.P.D. - 21 JUNIO 2008


Permítaseme apartarme del tema que generalmente ocupa mis envíos.

Hoy sábado 21 de Junio de 2008 es para mí un día muy triste, se fue uno de mis ex – alumnos a charlar con Dios.

Era un joven con un gran potencial, estudiante de Publicidad y amante de su deporte: el rugby

En una jugada desafortunada - y trampa del destino - sufrió un golpe de esos que este deporte tiene por miles como parte de su juego; o sea de contacto no de otra cosa

Juan Cruz, tal su nombre, fue alumno mío durante el último año de su colegio secundario (San Felipe Apóstol, de Don Torcuato), lo recuerdo como a alguien callado, respetuoso, tranquilo y con muchas inquietudes por su futuro.

Hoy no está más físicamente, pero siempre estará en mi corazón, como gran parte de aquellas personas a las cuales trato de trasmitir mis pequeños conocimientos técnicos y de vida.

Querido Juan Cruz Migliore, valga mi abrazo fraterno a la distancia, se que lo recibirás…

Con afecto y dolor

Fernando Julio Silva
21 de Junio, 2008

miércoles, 18 de junio de 2008

Los jóvenes adultos son el motor del consumo, tienen entre 30 y 40 años y buen pasar

Transitan la etapa de mayor consumismo y, a la vez, de productividad de sus vidas. Son básicamente hedonistas. Valoran la comodidad, la velocidad y la tecnología. Suelen tener mucho trabajo y dedicarle muchas horas, por lo tanto, tienen mayor propensión a estresarse y entonces gastan como modo de recompensarse. Salir a comer y comprar ropa son las dos actividades que les proporcionan mayor placer. Lo hacen con frecuencia: en promedio, dos veces por semana cenan afuera y gastan unos 70 pesos por comensal. Siete de cada diez compran en cuotas.

De acuerdo con un estudio realizado por American Express, ellos son el principal motor de la suba del consumo en la Argentina. Son jóvenes que tienen entre 30 y 40 años y pertenecen a estratos socioeconómicos medios y altos. Tienen ingresos altos y, en general, menos gastos fijos que los hogares de familias tradicionales, ya que la mayoría no tiene hijos. Sólo el 43,3% de ellos ahorra y quienes lo hacen, guardan entre el 20 y el 40% de lo que ganan.

Son los destinatarios del 77% de las publicidades, por esa razón, American Express realizó un estudio de mercado que permitió tomar "una radiografía de uno de los sectores que más influye en la economía y que resulta clave a las hora de definir tendencias".

Según el relevamiento, en el que se consultó a unos 200 jóvenes usuarios de tarjetas de crédito, este segmento es el referente aspiracional ineludible de las marcas en la Argentina. El 71,1% de ellos se sienten "racionales" en cuanto a los hábitos de consumo personal.

Entre los jóvenes que ahorran, la mayoría dijo que separa para ese fin entre el 20 y el 40% de sus ingresos. Mientras que el 26,5% de los que no ahorran dicen que prefieren darse gustos y disfrutar la vida.

Comprar una casa no figura entre las prioridades presupuestarias de los jóvenes. Aunque el estudio no indica cuántos de ellos poseen su propio techo, señala que sólo el 7,8% de los consultados está pagando su casa a través de un crédito. La mayoría de ellos consideró que ésa es su forma de ahorro.

Se trata de una generación de bon vivants. Para el 42% "vivir bien" significa tener tiempo libre y saber aprovecharlo para disfrutarlo con la familia y los amigos.

Los gustos:
aComer afuera: sentarse en un restaurante, ser bien atendido y estar en buena compañía es una de las gratificaciones más importantes para el 62% de los jóvenes consultados.

aPizza en decadencia: a la hora de definir el menú, el 58% de ellos prefiere la carne y la parrilla. Las pastas fueron elegidas por el 10,7% de los comensales, mientras que el 11,1% eligió cocinar en casa para sus amigos. La pizza con amigos es cada vez más olvidada. Sólo el 5,4% de los consultados la eligió, mientras que el 2,6% optó por los fastfood , entre otras opciones.

aComprar por Internet: el 22% de los encuestados hace compras online , aunque las mujeres llevan la delantera: el 23,5% de ellas hace compras y el 29% realiza operaciones bancarias virtuales, el doble que los hombres.

18/06/08



Espero les resultara de interés este envío

Hasta la próxima

Lic. Fernando Julio Silva
Junio 2008

sábado, 14 de junio de 2008

Business Plan: A model...

There are different types of business plans, but a good one should include the following items.

8Points to consider:

aWhere am I now?
aWhere do I want to get to?
aIn how long?
aDoes a similar product to mine exists or does a real possibility of appearance exist in the short, half or long term?
aWhich are my clients (real and/or potentials)?
aWhich is my competition (real and/or potential)?
aWhich are the tools that I have in order to move forward?
aFinancial availability (own and/or of third)
aQuantity of involved people
aAnalysis F.O.D.A. (Strengths / Weaknesses ; Opportunities / Threats)

8How the plan should be:

aAppraisable and quantifiable in short, half and long term
aFlexible (the strict objectives don't serve more)
aClear
aAble to reach (Pharaonic objectives are not viable and this makes that everything ends collapsing)

8Where I am now:

aAm I at the moment inside the market or do I aspire to enter in the same one?
aIf I am already inside, which is the reception that has my product in the same one?
aWhich are my objectives of short, half and long term?
aAm I satisfied with what was achieved up to now?
aWhich are the flaws that I see to the project?

8Where I want to arrive:

aWhich is my new objective layout?
aWhat advantages do I see of arriving to the same one? Are these real or mere illusions?
aWhat expects me when achieving that goal? (hostile / pleasing territory / it fights disloyal / others)

8Time:

aWhich are my time limitations?
aAre these acceptable ones in connection with my current situation?
aThe potential clients and the market, do they manage my same times?
aDo I possess another activity that allows me to have a wait mattress?

8Competition:

aDo I know to my competition?
aHave I carried out or do I have planned to make a market research investigation?
aHow long will I dedicate to the same one?
aWhich will my populational sample be?
aWhy is this?
aDoes a great of significant width exist in the chosen sample?
aAccording to what approaches do I carry out this selection? (Age, formal education, sex, religion, labor or social position, purcahsing power, accessibility to technology, others)

8Tools for the advance:

aDo I possess tools that allow me a real advance at the present time or is a planning of potentialities so alone?
aWould my organizational current structure, support this expansion?
aIndependently of the product, do I possess the human and/or technological appropriate capital to expand?
aHave I analyzed potentially with people involved if they are interested in this expansion?

8Financial availability:

aWhich is the necessary capital to invest under all concept? (I should carry out a sampling of total costs to determine it)
aThe value obtained in the previous point, condice with my budget?
aIs the capital of which I prepare own, of third or do I depend on a loan of financial institution? (I have to analyze the cost of the lending of the money)
aWhich is the rate of return of the investment?
aCompared with other investment variables, is mine appropriate or is a very risky project?
DO NOT forget that if I need external financing I should present a very detailed report about the capital necessities, which its destination, real risk of the investment, which is the source of payment of the loan, other)

8Analysis F.O.D.A

This is an indispensable tool when carrying out any analysis of project feasibility since it includes all the endogenous and exogenous variables of an idea / project / etc.

aStrengths & Weaknesses: they are internal, they depend on the idea, product, project or variable that it is analyzed

aOpportunities & Threats: in direct relationship with the environment and how this will affect us. They should be included here not alone the direct ones about our idea, but also the of the situation (regional, national, international, others) ones. Technically knows as externalities: Positives and negatives ones

Until the next one!

Lic. Fernando Julio Silva
June 2008

Modelo de Plan de Negocios

Existen de las más variadas formas, colores y calidad; pero un buen plan debería considerar los siguientes factores:
  • Dónde estoy ahora?
  • A qué lugar deseo llegar?
  • En cuánto tiempo?
  • Existe un producto similar al mío o la posibilidad real de apariencia de uno en el corto, mediano o largo plazo?
  • Cuáles son mis clientes? (reales y/o potenciales)
  • Cuál es mi competencia? (real y/o potencial)
  • Cuáles son las herramientas de las que dispongo para avanzar?
  • Cuál es mi disponibilidad financiera? (propia y/o terceros)
  • Cantidad de gente involucrada en el proyecto (directa e indirectamente)
  • Análisis F.O.D.A. (Fortalezas y Debilidades son internas; Oportunidades y Amenazas son externas)

A continuación, desarrollaré de manera breve los puntos nombrados.

Cómo debe ser el Plan:

  • Medible y cuantificable en el corto, mediano y largo plazo
  • Flexible (los objetivos estrictos no sirven más)
  • Claro
  • Alcanzable (los objetivos faraónicos no son viables y esto hace que todo se termine hundiendo)

Dónde estoy ahora?

  • Me encuentro actualmente dentro del mercado o aspiro a ingresar al mismo?
  • Si ya estoy dentro, cuál es la recepción que tiene mi producto?
  • Cuáles son mis objetivos de corto, mediano y largo plazo?
  • Estoy satisfecho con lo logrado hasta ahora?
  • Cuáles son las fallas que le veo - o que otros le ven - al proyecto?

A dónde quiero llegar?

  • Cuál es mi nuevo objetivo trazado?
  • Qué ventajas veo de llegar al mismo? Son éstas reales o meras ilusiones?
  • Qué me espera de alcanzar esa meta? (territorio hostil/grato/pelea desleal/otros)

Tiempo

  • Cuáles son los tiempos de espera que me propongo?
  • Son estos aceptables en relación con mi situación actual?
  • Los potenciales clientes y el mercado, manejas mis mismos tiempos?
  • Poseo otra actividad que me brinde un colchón de espera?

Competencia

  • Conozco bien a mi competencia?
  • He planeado o tengo pensado hacer una investigación de mercado?
  • Cuánto tiempo dedicaré al mismo?
  • Cuál es mi muestra poblacional?
  • Por qué es esta y no otra?
  • Existe un grado de amplitud significativa en la muestra elegida?
  • Según qué criterios realizo esta selección? (edad, educación formal, sexo, religión, posición laboral o social, poder adquisitivo, accesibilidad a tecnología, otros)

Herramientas para el avance

  • Poseo en la actualidad herramientas que me permitan un avance real o es tan solo una planificación de potencialidades?
  • Mi actual estructura organizacional, soportaría esta expansión?
  • Independientemente del producto, poseo el capital humano y/o tecnológico adecuado para expandirme?
  • He analizado con la gente potencialmente involucrada si está de acuerdo con la expansión?

Disponibilidad financiera

  • Cuál es el capital necesario a invertir bajo todo concepto? (debo realizar un muestreo de costos totales para hacerlo)
  • El valor obtenido en el punto anterior, condice con mi presupuesto?
  • El capital del que dispongo es propio, de terceros o dependo de un préstamo de institución financiera? (NO debo dejar de considerar el costo del préstamo del dinero)
  • Cuál es la tasa de retorno de la inversión?
  • Comparado con otras variables de inversión, es mi proyecto adecuado o muy riesgoso?
  • No olvidar que de ser necesario financiamiento externo debo presentar un informe muy detallado sobre las necesidades de capital, cuál es su destino, riesgo real de la inversión, fuente de pago del préstamo, otros)

Análisis F.O.D.A.

Es una herramienta imprescindible al realizar cualquier análisis de factibilidad de proyecto ya que estudia todas las variables endógenas y exógenas de una idea, proyecto, etc.

  • Fortalezas & Debilidades: propias, son internas, dependen de la idea, producto, proyecto o variable que se analiza
  • Oportunidades & Amenazas: están en relación directa con el entorno y cómo éste nos afectará. Se deben incluir aquí no solo las que influyen de manera directa nuestra idea, sino también las coyunturales (regionales, nacionales, internacionales, otras) Desde lo técnicamente económico son las externalidades: Positivas o negativas

Hasta la próxima!

Lic. Fernando Julio Silva

Junio 2008

viernes, 13 de junio de 2008

Michael Dell un breve camino de 1000 dólares a 18000 millones

VIE 14/09/07 18:38 Dell empezó con 1000 dólares en el dormitorio de una universidad en 1984. Comenzó a vender computadoras sin intermediarios con un ingenioso sistema de distribución.
La historia de un hombre que hoy factura US$49.000 millones anuales.
DELL. El universitario que abandonó sus estudios para dedicarse de lleno al negocio.

Por MATERIABIZ redaccion@materiabiz.com
Nacido en febrero de 1965 en Houston, Texas, Michael Saúl Dell empezó su camino hacia la cumbre en 1984, en su dormitorio de la Universidad de Texas con apenas mil dólares y una gran idea: vender computadoras baratas a estudiantes. ¿Cómo hacerlo?

Su visión fue la siguiente: "En el negocio de la venta de hardware hay demasiadas personas. Eliminando los intermediarios podrían ofrecerse máquinas baratas". Dicho y hecho, Dell comenzó a vender computadoras sin intermediarios con un ingenioso sistema de distribución. La compañía fue tan exitosa que el joven pronto abandonó los estudios para dedicarse a tiempo completo.

Otra serie de innovaciones siguieron impulsando la competitividad de la empresa. Dell aplicó un método de producción a pedido que no acumula inventarios y llevó el outsourcing hasta las últimas consecuencias para recortar costos, parcelando la producción en decenas de países. Sus computadoras baratas empezaron a venderse como pan caliente.

¿El resultado? En menos de 20 años, la compañía pasó de una facturación anual de 6 millones de dólares a 49.000 millones, con más de 40.000 empleados de más de 170 nacionalidades. Michael, por su parte, llegó al cuarto puesto de los hombres más ricos de los Estados Unidos. Hoy está fuera de los 20 primeros, pero mantiene una fortuna de 15.800 millones, según la revista Forbes.

http://www.ieco.clarin.com/notas/2007/09/14/01499324.html

Un buen artículo sobre flexibilidad estructural en una empresa (Idioma Inglés)

Smashing The Clock
No schedules. No mandatory meetings. Inside Best Buy's radical reshaping of the workplace

Dec. 11th, 2006

One afternoon last year, Chap Achen, who oversees online orders at Best Buy Co. (BBY), shut down his computer, stood up from his desk, and announced that he was leaving for the day. It was around 2 p.m., and most of Achen's staff were slumped over their keyboards, deep in a post-lunch, LCD-lit trance. "See you tomorrow," said Achen. "I'm going to a matinee."

Under normal circumstances, an early-afternoon departure would have been totally un-Achen. After all, this was a 37-year-old corporate comer whose wife laughs in his face when he utters the words "work-life balance." But at Best Buy's Minneapolis headquarters, similar incidents of strangeness were breaking out all over the ultramodern campus. In employee relations, Steve Hance had suddenly started going hunting on workdays, a Remington 12-gauge in one hand, a Verizon LG (VZ ) in the other. In the retail training department, e-learning specialist Mark Wells was spending his days bombing around the country following rocker Dave Matthews. Single mother Kelly McDevitt, an online promotions manager, started leaving at 2:30 p.m. to pick up her 11-year-old son Calvin from school. Scott Jauman, a Six Sigma black belt, began spending a third of his time at his Northwoods cabin.

At most companies, going AWOL during daylight hours would be grounds for a pink slip. Not at Best Buy. The nation's leading electronics retailer has embarked on a radical--if risky--experiment to transform a culture once known for killer hours and herd-riding bosses. The endeavor, called ROWE, for "results-only work environment," seeks to demolish decades-old business dogma that equates physical presence with productivity. The goal at Best Buy is to judge performance on output instead of hours.

Hence workers pulling into the company's amenity-packed headquarters at 2 p.m. aren't considered late. Nor are those pulling out at 2 p.m. seen as leaving early. There are no schedules. No mandatory meetings. No impression-management hustles. Work is no longer a place where you go, but something you do. It's O.K. to take conference calls while you hunt, collaborate from your lakeside cabin, or log on after dinner so you can spend the afternoon with your kid.

Best Buy did not invent the post-geographic office. Tech companies have been going bedouin for several years. At IBM (IBM ), 40% of the workforce has no official office; at AT&T, a third of managers are untethered. Sun Microsystems Inc. (SUNW ) calculates that it's saved $400 million over six years in real estate costs by allowing nearly half of all employees to work anywhere they want. And this trend seems to have legs. A recent Boston Consulting Group study found that 85% of executives expect a big rise in the number of unleashed workers over the next five years. In fact, at many companies the most innovative new product may be the structure of the workplace itself.

But arguably no big business has smashed the clock quite so resolutely as Best Buy. The official policy for this post-face-time, location-agnostic way of working is that people are free to work wherever they want, whenever they want, as long as they get their work done. "This is like TiVo (TIVO ) for your work," says the program's co-founder, Jody Thompson. By the end of 2007, all 4,000 staffers working at corporate will be on ROWE. Starting in February, the new work environment will become an official part of Best Buy's recruiting pitch as well as its orientation for new hires. And the company plans to take its clockless campaign to its stores--a high-stakes challenge that no company has tried before in a retail environment.

Another thing about this experiment: It wasn't imposed from the top down. It began as a covert guerrilla action that spread virally and eventually became a revolution. So secret was the operation that Chief Executive Brad Anderson only learned the details two years after it began transforming his company. Such bottom-up, stealth innovation is exactly the kind of thing Anderson encourages. The Best Buy chief aims to keep innovating even when something is ostensibly working. "ROWE was an idea born and nurtured by a handful of passionate employees," he says. "It wasn't created as the result of some edict."

So bullish are Anderson and his team on the idea that they have formed a subsidiary called CultureRx, set up to help other companies go clockless. CultureRx expects to sign up at least one large client in the coming months.

The CEO may have bought in, but there has been plenty of opposition inside the company. Many execs wondered if the program was simply flextime in a prettier bottle. Others felt that working off-site would lead to longer hours and destroy forever the demarcation between work and personal time. Cynics thought it was all a PR stunt dreamed up by Machiavellian operatives in human resources. And as ROWE infected one department after the other, its supporters ran into old-guard saboteurs, who continue to plot an overthrow and spread warnings of a coming paradise for slackers.

Then again, the new work structure's proponents say it's helping Best Buy overcome challenges. And thanks to early successes, some of the program's harshest critics have become true believers. With gross margins on electronics under pressure, and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT ) and Target Corp. (TGT ) shouldering into Best Buy territory, the company has been moving into services, including its Geek Squad and "customer centricity" program in which salespeople act as technology counselors. But Best Buy was afflicted by stress, burnout, and high turnover. The hope was that ROWE, by freeing employees to make their own work-life decisions, could boost morale and productivity and keep the service initiative on track.

It seems to be working. Since the program's implementation, average voluntary turnover has fallen drastically, CultureRx says. Meanwhile, Best Buy notes that productivity is up an average 35% in departments that have switched to ROWE. Employee engagement, which measures employee satisfaction and is often a barometer for retention, is way up too, according to the Gallup Organization, which audits corporate cultures.

ROWE may also help the company pay for the customer centricity campaign. The endeavor is hugely expensive because it involves tailoring stores to local markets and training employees to turn customer feedback into new business ideas. By letting people work off-campus, Best Buy figures it can reduce the need for corporate office space, perhaps rent out the empty cubicles to other companies, and plow the millions of dollars in savings into its services initiative.

Phyllis Moen, a University of Minnesota sociology professor who researches work-life issues, is studying the Best Buy experiment in a project sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. She says most companies are stuck in the 1930s when it comes to employees' and managers' relationships to time and work. "Our whole notion of paid work was developed within an assembly line culture," Moen says. "Showing up was work. Best Buy is recognizing that sitting in a chair is no longer working."

ONE GIANT WIRELESS KIBBUTZ
Jody Thompson and Cali Ressler are two HR people you actually don't hate. They groan over cultish corporate slogans like "Build Superior Organizational Capability." They disdain Outlook junkies who double-book and showboating PowerPointers. But it's flextime, or Big Business' answer to overwork, long commutes, and lack of work-family balance, that elicits the harshest verdict. "A con game," says Thompson. "A total joke," adds Ressler.

Flexible work schedules, they say, heap needless bureaucracy on managers instead of addressing the real issue: how to work more efficiently in an era of transcontinental teams and multiple time zones. They add that flextime also stigmatizes those who use it (the reason so few do) and keeps companies acting like the military (fixated on schedules) when they should behave more like MySpace (NWS ) (social networks where real-time innovation can flourish). Besides, they say, if people can virtually carry their office around in their pockets or pocketbooks, why should it matter where and when they work if they are crushing their goals?

Thompson, 49, and Ressler, 29, met three years ago. The boomer and the Gen Xer got each other right away. When they talk about their meeting, it sounds like something out of Plato for HR, or two like minds making a whole. At the time, Best Buy was still a ferociously face-time place. Workers arriving after 8 a.m. on sub-zero mornings stashed their parkas in their cars to foil detection as late arrivals. Early escapees crept down back stairwells. Cube-side, the living was equally uneasy. One manager required his MBAs to sign out for lunch, including listing their restaurant locations and ETAs. Another insisted his team track its work--every 15 minutes. As at many companies, the last one to turn out the lights won.

Outside the office, Thompson and Ressler couldn't help noticing how wireless broadband was turning the world into one giant work kibbutz. They talked about how managers were mired in analog-age inertia, often judging performance on how much they saw you, vs. how much you did. Ressler and Thompson recognized the dangerous, life-wrecking cocktail in the making: The always-on worker now also had to be always in.

The culture, not exactly Minnesota-nice, was threatening Best Buy's massive expansion plans. But Ressler and Thompson knew their solution was too radical to simply trot up to CEO Anderson. Nor, in the beginning, did they feel they could lobby their executive supervisors for official approval. Besides, they knew the usual corporate route of imposing something from the top down would bomb. So they met in private, stealthily strategizing about how to protect ROWE and then dribble it out under the radar in tiny pilot trials. Ressler and Thompson waited patiently for the right opportunity.

It came in 2003. Two managers--one in the properties division, the other in communications--were desperate. Top performers were complaining of unsustainable levels of stress, threatening business continuity just when Best Buy was rolling out its customer centricity campaign in hundreds of stores. They also knew from employee engagement data that workers were suffering from the classic work-life hex: jobs with high demands (always-on, transcontinental availability) and low control (always on-site, no personal life).

Ressler and Thompson saw their opening in these two vanguard managers. Would they be willing to partake in a private management experiment? The two outlined their vision. They explained how in the world of ROWE, there would be no mandatory meetings. No times when you had to physically be at work. Performance would be based on output, not hours. Managers would base assessments on data and evidence, not feelings and anecdotes. The executives liked what they heard and agreed.

The experiment quickly gained social networking heat. Waiting in line at Best Buy's on-site Caribou Coffee (CBOU ), in e-mails, and during drive-by's at friends' desks, employees in other parts of the company started hearing about this seeming antidote to megahour agita. A curious culture of haves and have-nots emerged on the Best Buy campus, with those in ROWE sporting special stickers on their laptops as though they were part of some cabal. Hance, the hunter, started taking conference calls in tree stands and exchanging e-mails from his fishing boat. When Wells wasn't following around Dave Matthews, chances were he was biking around Minneapolis' network of urban lakes, and digging into work only after night had fallen. Hourly workers were still putting in a full 40, but began doing so wherever and whenever they wanted.

At first, participants were loath to share anything about ROWE with higher-ups for fear the perk would be taken away or reversed. But by 2004, loftier and loftier levels of management began hearing about the experiment at about the time opposition to it grew more intense. Critics feared executives would lose control and co-workers would forfeit the collaboration born of proximity. If you can work anywhere, they asked, won't you always be working? Won't overbearing bosses start calling you in the middle of the night? Won't coasters see ROWE as a way to shirk work and force more dedicated colleagues to pick up the slack? And there were generational conflicts: Some boomers felt they'd been forced to choose between work and life during their careers. So everyone else should, too.

Shari Ballard, Best Buy's executive vice-president for human capital and leadership (an analog title if ever there was one), was originally skeptical, although she eventually bought in. At first she couldn't figure out why managers needed a new methodology to help solve the work-life conundrum. "It wasn't hugs and smiles," she says of Ressler's and Thompson's campaign. "Managers in the old mental model were totally irritated." In the e-learning division, many of Wells's older co-workers (read 40-year-olds; the average age at Best Buy is 36) expressed resentment over the change, insisting that work relationships are better face-to-face, not screen-to-screen. "We have people in our group who are like, `I'm not going to do it,'" says Wells, who likes to sleep in and doesn't own an alarm clock. "I'm like, `that's fine, but I'm outta here.'" In enemy circles, Ressler and Thompson are known to this day as "those two" and "the subversives."

Yet ROWE continues to spread through the company. If intrigued nonparticipants work for progressive superiors, they usually talk up the program and get their bosses to agree to trials. If they toil under clock-watchers, they form underground networks and quietly lobby for outside support until there is usually no choice but for their boss to switch. It was only this past summer that CEO Anderson got a full briefing, and total understanding, about what was happening. "We purposely waited until the tipping point before we took it to him," says Thompson. Until then he wasn't well-versed on the 13 ROWE commandments. No.1: People at all levels stop doing any activity that is a waste of their time, the customer's time, or the company's money. No.7: Nobody talks about how many hours they work. No.9: It's O.K. to take a nap on a Tuesday afternoon, grocery shop on Wednesday morning, or catch a movie on Thursday afternoon.

That's the commandment Achen was following when he took off that day to see Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith. Doing so felt abnormal and uncomfortable. Achen felt guilty. But Ressler and Thompson had told him to "model the behavior." So he did. It helped that Achen saw in ROWE the potential to solve a couple of nagging business problems. As the head of the unit that monitors everything that happens after someone places an order at BestBuy.com, including manually reviewing orders and flagging them for possible fraud, Achen wanted to expand the hours of operation without mandating that people show up in the office at 6 a.m. He had another issue. One of his top-performing managers lived in St. Cloud, Minn., and commuted two and a half hours each way to work. He and Achen had a gentleman's agreement that he could work from home on Fridays. But the rest of the staff didn't appreciate the favoritism. "It was creating a lot of tension on my team," says Achen.

RECORD JOB SATISFACTION
Ressler and Thompson had convinced Achen that ROWE would work. Now Achen would have to convince the general manager of BestBuy.com, senior vice-president John "J.T." Thompson. That wasn't going to be easy. Thompson, a former General Electric Co. (GE ) guy, was as old school as they come with his starched shirt, booming voice, and ramrod-straight posture. He came of age believing there were three 8-hour days in every 24 hours. He loved working in his office on weekends. At first, he pushed back hard. "I was not supportive," says Thompson, who was privately terrified about the loss of control. "He didn't want anything to do with it," says Achen. "He was all about measurement, and he kept asking me, `How are you going to measure this so you know you're getting the same productivity out of people?'"

That's where Achen's performance metrics came in handy. He could measure how many orders per hour his team was processing no matter where they were. He told Thompson he'd reel everyone back to campus the minute he noticed a dip. Within a month, Achen could see that not only was his team's productivity up, but engagement scores, or measuring job satisfaction and retention, were the highest in the dot-com division's history.

For years, engagement had been a sore spot for Thompson. "I showed J.T. these scores, and his eyes lit up," says Achen. Thompson rushed to roll out ROWE to his entire department. Voluntary turnover among men dropped from 16.11% to 0. "For years I had been focused on the wrong currency," says Thompson. "I was always looking to see if people were here. I should have been looking at what they were getting done."

Today, Achen's commuting employee usually comes in once a week. Nearly three-quarters of his staff spend most of their time out of the office. Doesn't he worry that he loses some of the interoffice magic when they don't gather together all day, every day? What about the value in riffing on one another's ideas? What about teamwork and camaraderie? "You absolutely lose some of that," he says. "But what we get back far outweighs anything we've lost."

Achen says he would never go back. Orders processed by people who are not working in the office are up 13% to 18% over those who are. ROWE'ers are posting higher metrics for quality, too. Achen says he believes that's due to the new office paradox: Given the constant distractions, it sometimes feels impossible to get any work done at work.

Ressler and Thompson say all the Best Buy groups that have switched to the freer structurereport similar results. Meanwhile, the two have other big plans for the company. Last month they launched a new pilot called Cube-Free. Ressler and Thompson believe offices encourage the wrong kinds of habits, keeping people wrapped up in a paper, prewireless mentality as opposed to pushing employees to use technology in the efficiency-enhancing way it was intended. Offices also waste space and time in an age when workers are becoming more and more place-neutral. "This also sets up Best Buy to be able to completely operate if disaster hits," says Thompson. Work groups that go cube-free will be able to redesign their spaces to better accommodate collaboration instead of working alone.

Next year Ressler and Thompson plan to pilot their boldest move yet, testing ROWE in retail stores among both managers and workers. How exactly they will do this in an environment where salespeople presumably need to put in regular hours, they won't say. And they acknowledge it won't be easy. Still, they are eager to try just about anything to help the company slash its 65% turnover rates in stores, where disgruntlement is common and workers form groups on MySpace with names like "Best Buy Losers Club!"

Best Buy has transformed its workplace culture in a remarkably short time. Isn't it also true that ROWE could unravel just as quickly? What happens if the company hits a speed bump? Competition isn't getting any less intense, after all. Best Buy sells a lot of extended warranties, an area where both Wal-Mart and Target are eager to undercut the electronics retailer on price. What's more, the current boom in flat-panel, digital TVs will peak in a few years.

If Best Buy's business goes south, human nature dictates that the people who always believed the clockless office was a flaky New Age idea will see an opportunity to try to force a hasty retreat. Some at the company complain that productivity is up only because many Best Buyers are now working longer hours. And some die-hard ROWE opponents still privately roll their eyes when they see Ressler and Thompson in the hallway.
But it's worth remembering that most big companies fail to grow at the rate of inflation. That's true in part because the bigger the company gets, the harder it is to get the best out of each and every employee. ROWE is one of Best Buy's answers to avoiding that fate. "The old way of managing and looking at work isn't going to work anymore," says Ressler. "We want to revolutionize the way work gets done." Admit it, you're rooting for them, too.

sábado, 7 de junio de 2008

El Plan de Negocios (es como la brújula en el campamento)

Cuando nos proponemos realizar cualquier tipo de actividad en nuestras vidas primero pensamos qué queremos hacer, cuándo, dónde, qué vamos a necesitar, realizamos ajustes a nuestra idea original, buscamos los fondos para poder llevar eso adelante, comenzamos y realizamos ajustes sobre la marcha.

Quién no ha hecho esto alguna vez - o quizás siempre - en su vida? Hasta en algunas ocasiones lo hacemos sin pensar demasiado en ello!

Pues bien, lo que figura en el primer párrafo no es ni más ni menos que un tipo de planificación. O sea, que a veces sin saberlo, estamos realizando un pequeño "Plan de Negocios"

Pasemos ahora a este último punto, que resulta el más importante para la concreción de cualquier emprendimiento empresarial.

  1. Lo primero que debe hacerse es estudiar el mercado y cuáles son nuestras posibilidades reales de ingresar al mismo.

  2. Luego tenemos que estudiar si está dentro de esas posibilidades el producir lo que ese mercado busca.

  3. Analizar la competencia que deberemos enfrentar (Oportunidades & Amenazas)

  4. Analizar nuestros puntos fuertes y débiles (Fortalezas & Debilidades)

  5. Cuáles serán nuestros costos fijos y variables

  6. El punto de equilibrio, a partir del cual comenzaremos atener ganancias

  7. El tiempo de recupero de la inversión realizada

  8. Planificar estrategias alternativas por si existen fallas o correcciones que debamos implementar sobre nuestro plan original

  9. Tener en claro cuál es nuestra principal fuente de financiamiento (propia, préstamos bancarios, familiares, inversionistas, etc)

  10. A posteriori del punto anterior debo trazar un plan de trabajo para poder demostrar a estos inversionistas potenciales la factibilidad de la idea


Como se puede apreciar, este es un trabajo aún mayor que el de la identificación de una idea potencial.


Ideas pueden haber muchas, pero muchas de ellas quedan tan solo en eso... buenas ideas por carecer de un plan fuerte que las respalde.


Vale la pena invertir en el plan, es nuestro punto de partida.


Hasta la próxima


Lic. Fernando Julio Silva

viernes, 6 de junio de 2008

El voluntariado... una opción enriquecedora

Quienes han tenido la posibilidad de realizar algún tipo de voluntariado en el ámbito de los negocios siempre hablamos de resultados altamente positivos, de gran crecimiento del espíritu -propio y ajeno.

Es muy gratificante ver que uno ha podido aportar su pequeño granito de arena a otro semejante, que ha podido orientar sus ideas y clarificar sus dudas. Sentirse como parte de ese producto final alcanzado.

Sentir la adrenalina que corre junto con la del asesorado: las caídas, las recuperaciones, los tiempos que corren, etc. En una palabra: El DESAFÍO

Existen grandes posibilidades de participar a través de infinidad de proyectos y quizás con una muy pequeña inversión de nuestra parte podamos recoger grandes dividendos a futuro (Nadie sabe el poder de un abrazo de agradecimiento hasta que lo recibe, y les garantizo, no hay dinero que pague eso!)

Hagan la prueba, vale la pena...

NOTA: Hasta el momento he participado como voluntario en programas de Junior Achievement de Argentina, Bolsa de Comercio de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires (PRODIBUR), Micro empresas (desarrollo propio para estudiantes entre 16-18 años) y lo estoy por hacer en Desafío Joven (ACDE & Shell)

Hasta la próxima

Lic. Fernando Julio Silva

Un trozo de madera... una idea genial!

Creería Ud. que un pequeño trozo de madera fue convertido hace unos cuantos años en un producto genial? Pues la respuesta es afirmativa!

El precio de venta, el muy bajo costo total, el ser una experiencia micro emprendedora, el apoyo de los adquirientes y por qué no... cierto nivel de "superstición" - "nadie" quería dejar pasar la posibilidad de que la buena suerte lo acompañe - hizo que el producto saliera como pan caliente, superando las expectativas más optimistas.

Cuál fue el slogan de la campaña? "Toco madera no puede faltar en su escritorio"

NOTA: Este producto existió en la vida real, fue realizado hace ya algún tiempo por un grupo de gente joven que tomó parte del proyecto "La Cía." de Junior Achievement de Argentina

RESUMEN: Muchas veces una idea que puede parecer pequeña e insignificante, si está bien desarrollada, puede terminar convirtiéndose en una GRAN IDEA!

Hasta la próxima

Lic. Fernando Julio Silva
Junio 2008

miércoles, 4 de junio de 2008

El marketing & la publicidad... ¿todo lo pueden?

Una muy buena campaña de marketing, acompañada por un buen apoyo publicitario, permiten vender hasta una pieza inservible, haciendo sentir al comprador que ha realizado la mejor compra de su vida! Es esto tan así? Se considera que el potencial comprador no sabe razonar antes de comprar un producto?

Existen estudios que así lo prueban, estudios realizados sobre la creación de una necesidad de poseer un producto, de focalizar la campaña en la creación de ese deseo. Por ejemplo, cuántas veces hemos concurrido a un hipermercado con una lista estricta de compra y hemos vuelto a nuestros hogares con muchas más cosas de las que en ese pedazo de papel figuraban?... y no nos ha pasado de olvidarnos de comprar el producto que en realidad motivó nuestra idea a ese lugar?
Una buena campaña nos debe convencer de que el producto en cuestión nos es imprescindible para nuestro diario vivir y que sin el mismo nuestra vida carece de sentido.
Acaso, no es parte de la estrategia el lanzar con cierta anticipación la publicidad de un producto que todavía no ha arribado al mercado creando un deseo de compra, el cual hace que un stock reducido desaparezca del mercado en un corto plazo y cree una ansiedad aún mayor por poder tenerlo?
Será que el marketing cada día se acerca más a la Psicología...
El tema da para mucho más, así que si alguien desea recoger el guante y dar su opinión, la misma será valorada!
Prof. Lic. Fernando Julio Silva